The leadership of the Obidient Movement has launched a sharp critique against the All Progressives Congress, asserting that the ruling party is systematically weaponizing the judiciary to weaken political rivals and consolidate its power. In a formal statement released on Monday, the movement claimed that recent court rulings and ongoing litigation involving opposition figures suggest a coordinated effort to stifle political competition. According to the group, these legal maneuvers are being utilized to divert the focus of opposition leaders, exhaust their resources, and ultimately exclude them from participating meaningfully in the democratic process. Spokespersons for the movement argued that the independence of the judicial branch is currently under threat, with the executive arm of government allegedly influencing outcomes to favor the ruling party. They highlighted several ongoing cases, noting a pattern where judicial intervention appears to align with the political interests of the governing administration. The group asserted that if the current trend continues, it would lead to a significant decline in public trust regarding the impartiality of the courts. Furthermore, the movement warned that these actions risk destabilizing the nation's fragile political environment. They called for an immediate cessation of what they described as the misuse of state institutions, urging the National Judicial Council to uphold the sanctity of the law and ensure that judges operate without fear or pressure from partisan actors. The All Progressives Congress has not yet issued a formal response to these specific allegations. However, the development has sparked a heated debate across various platforms, with political analysts divided on whether these legal challenges are genuine applications of electoral laws or strategic attempts to manipulate the political landscape in anticipation of future electoral cycles. The Obidient Movement concluded its statement by calling on civil society organizations, international observers, and the electorate to remain vigilant, emphasizing that a robust opposition is essential for maintaining accountability and transparency in governance.